You are here: Home Classics History of Ancient Rome Exams Midterm Exam

Midterm Exam

Document Actions
  • Content View
  • Bookmarks
The midterm examination for Roman History
I.    Map Identification.  (8 pts.)

Identify four (4) of the following and then locate each item correctly by its number (e.g. 1, 2, 3) on the map.    

 

Imperium Romanum

 

II.    Chronology.  (12 pts.)

Locate each item below by writing its letter on the time-line within the proper century and in proper relation to other items in the same century.   

 |-----------------|------------------|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|

         BC 500              400                 300                 200               100               AD 1

 

  

III.    Identification.  (10 pts.)

Answer ten (10) of the following.

 

IV.    Short Identification. (20 pts.)

In 3-4 well-crafted sentences identify two (2) of the following. Be sure to locate the item within its specific historical context—time and place—and to discuss its significance for our knowledge of the ancient Romans.  

  1. Quintus Fabius Pictor
  2. Battle of Alesia
  3. Tomb of the Leopards (slide)
  4. Syria-Palestine

  

V.    Essay. (50 pts.)

Choose one of the following three topics and prepare to write an essay on it for the exam.  A good essay will have an introduction with thesis statement, a well organized discussion of the thesis based on close reading of the primary sources, and a strong conclusion.  At all times write clearly and legibly with correct spelling and punctuation. You may not use any notes during the exam.

  1. Romans and Non-Romans.  Looking at the primary evidence for Roman perspectives on non-Romans from the period of the early monarchy down to the death of Cleopatra, discuss what you think are the main themes in Roman attitudes toward outsiders.  Who qualifies as an outsider?  Are there different categories of outsiders?  How do Roman concepts of non-Romans affect foreign policy, for example, or the Roman economy?  You may choose to develop your own questions, if you wish.  Also, choose a reasonable number of examples (at least three) to discuss in detail rather than covering too much evidence in a cursory manner.

     

  2. Violence in Roman Politics.  Examine the primary evidence for the assassination of Tiberius Gracchus or Gaius Gracchus and the evidence for the assassination of Julius Caesar and discuss whether or not you see these deaths as comparable in terms of what factors led to the violence, who perpetrated the violence, and what the violence was meant to accomplish.  You may develop other criteria for comparison, if you wish.

     

  3. The Judgment of Roman Historians.  Livy writes in the introduction to his history of Rome: 

    …no state was ever greater, none more righteous or richer in good examples, non ever was where avarice and luxury came into the social order so late, or where humble means and thrift were so highly esteemed and so long held in honor.  For true it is that the less men’s wealth was, the less was their greed.  Of late, riches have brought in avarice, and excessive pleasures the longing to carry wantonness and license to the point of personal ruin and universal destruction. 

    In your opinion, is this description of the moral rise and fall of Roman Republican society a fair analysis of what went wrong in Rome and her empire at the end of the Republic?  Is Livy’s analysis typical of Roman historiography generally at this time?

 

 

 

Reuse Course
Download IMS package